Home Unfiltered Articles Players Baseball Prospectus
Basketball Prospectus home
Click here to log in Click here for forgotten password Click here to subscribe

Click here for Important Basketball Prospectus Premium Information!

<< Previous Article
2010 Free Agency (07/15)
Next Article >>
Blockbuster Busts (07/23)

July 16, 2010
A Matter of Length
The Danger of Long-Term Contracts

by Kevin Pelton


"It isn't the high price of stars that is expensive, it's the high price of mediocrity," former Chicago White Sox owner Bill Veeck once famously observed. I've borrowed this quote, which I remember learning from the Baseball Prospectus annual, in the past. More and more all the time, however, I'm not certain Veeck's quote really sums up the issue. It's not even the high cost of mediocrity that kills teams--it's the duration of it.

This jumped out at me over the course of compiling my position-by-position rankings of free agents. Sprinkled throughout these lists are players who have long since ceased to have any value to their team and have hung around solely because of their contract. Now, this is not any sort of criticism of the guaranteed contract in general or player motivation. Often, like Antonio Daniels or the more extreme case of Cuttino Mobley, injury is a culprit. Sometimes, the player just aged. And occasionally, as in the case of Trenton Hassell, the contract was simply a mistake from day one.

Instead, I see the takeaway as how teams can get themselves in trouble with the lengths of the contracts they offer as much as the yearly salary. To try to gain some insight into this phenomenon, I went through and looked up all the contracts of five years or longer that were signed in free agency (no extensions) and concluded at the end of last season.

I found 23 such contracts, with the biggest (Ray Allen for $80 million over five years) and smallest (Damien Wilkins for $14.5 million over five years) both handed out by the Seattle SuperSonics during the summer of 2005. The majority of the deals (13) were for five years, with several six-year contracts and a couple of seven-year ones signed during the 2003 offseason by Brad Miller and Kenny Thomas rounding out the group.

Even without going to the numbers, it's obvious that teams came to regret many of the long-term offers they handed out. Of the 23 players, just four spent the duration of their contract with the team that signed them, and even one of those comes with an asterisk (Zydrunas Ilgauskas, who was bought out of his contract and returned to Cleveland after being traded to Washington). While not all of the decisions were made because of performance, nearly half the 23 players (11) were either waived or bought out before their contracts ended. And five players (Daniels, Mark Blount, Jerome James, Darius Miles and Cuttino Mobley) did not see a single minute of action in 2009-10.

The summary statistics reinforce this conclusion. I looked at both average minutes played by year and average WARP totals to provide two different perspectives. Note that I only looked at the first five years, so for Miller and Thomas, for example, this ignores their performance the last two seasons so the pool of players remains consistent.

Stat       Yr1    Yr2    Yr3    Yr4    Yr5
Minutes   2183   1859   1985   1508   1170
WARP       3.7    1.9    2.6    1.5    1.4

The first three years, players averaged about starters' minutes (26-30 minutes a night) and posted WARP totals around league average. Things went downhill the next two seasons, when free agents' minutes plummeted and their WARP totals dropped. Exacerbating the problem is the fact that most NBA contracts escalate year over year, so these players were making progressively more money for less production.

One other way to break down the numbers is by the annual salary, separating the star players like Allen from the role players. Are long-term contracts more of an issue for one group or the other? I came up with four groups--star players (at least $10 million on average over the life of the contract), those above the mid-level exception ($7 million-$10 million), the mid-level exception ($5.7 million to $6.3 million) and everything below. Here's how they compare in the same breakdown.

Type       Yr1    Yr2    Yr3    Yr4    Yr5
Stars     2340   2067   2555   2414   1871
AboveMLE  1638   1842   1189    898   1061
MLE       1615   1486   1479   1050    846
BelowMLE  2366   2438   2297   1626   1252

Type       Yr1    Yr2    Yr3    Yr4    Yr5
Stars      7.4    5.0    6.7    6.9    3.3
AboveMLE   4.5    1.4    2.2    0.2    1.4
MLE        1.1    0.6    0.8   -0.6    0.3
BelowMLE   2.6    1.3    1.4    0.5    0.9

The sample sizes are small here (no more than seven players in any group), so drawing any strong conclusions would be dangerous. Still, what we see generally confirms conventional wisdom. The star players remained good values through year four before finally dropping in year five. Everyone else dropped considerably after year three.

Two sidenotes. First, players in this group signed to mid-level contracts were uniformly awful. This ties in nicely to my breakdown two summers ago of how poorly mid-level deals have failed, which I speculated might be partly due to the length of the contracts handed out to them. Surprisingly, players on smaller contracts actually faired quite well, with Rafer Alston, Raja Bell and Kyle Korver all proving bargains among this group.

Looking over all the data, it appears the sweet spot for free-agent contracts is about three years. Past this, the risk escalates quickly. Predicting performance next season is hard enough, so trying to figure out what a player will be like five years down the line (or even whether they'll be healthy then) is nigh impossible. For stars, that risk is an acceptable part of acquiring an elite talent. Among the NBA's middle class, it's difficult to justify going much more than three years. A four-year deal can be justified because the expiring contract becomes valuable as a trade asset the last year, but five-year deals to marginal talents simply aren't worth it.

Looking at the contracts handed out so far this summer, several fall into this category. Phoenix's Channing Frye, Milwaukee's Drew Gooden, Denver's Al Harrington (only fully guaranteed for the first three years), Toronto's Amir Johnson, Portland's Wesley Matthews (an offer sheet the Jazz reportedly will not match), Miami's Mike Miller and New Jersey's Travis Outlaw all got five-year deals right around the mid-level exception. Meanwhile, even if Brendan Haywood's sixth year only becomes guaranteed based on conditional performance, his contract is both too long and too lucrative.

By next summer, six-year contracts may be a thing of the past. The last CBA limited teams to six years when re-signing their own free agents or five years for other teams' players, down from seven and six, respectively. The league will surely look to cut down contract lengths again, and they'll probably use data like this. But there's already a simpler answer for intelligent teams: Don't make long offers and let other teams deal with the painful consequences.

Kevin Pelton is an author of Basketball Prospectus. You can contact Kevin by clicking here or click here to see Kevin's other articles.

0 comments have been left for this article.

<< Previous Article
2010 Free Agency (07/15)
Next Article >>
Blockbuster Busts (07/23)

State of Basketball Prospectus: A Brief Anno...
Tuesday Truths: March-at-Last Edition
Easy Bubble Solver: The Triumphant Return
Premium Article Bubbles of their Own Making: Villanova, Temp...
Tuesday Truths: Crunch Time Edition

2010-08-13 - Best of the '90s: Ranking by WARP
2010-07-30 - Making a Career: So You Want to Do Sports St...
2010-07-23 - Blockbuster Busts: Trading a Superstar
2010-07-16 - A Matter of Length: The Danger of Long-Term ...
2010-07-15 - 2010 Free Agency: Centers
2010-07-14 - Transaction Analysis: Two Trades
2010-07-13 - 2010 Free Agency: Power Forwards

Basketball Prospectus Home  |  Terms of Service  |  Privacy Policy  |  Contact Us
Copyright © 1996-2017 Prospectus Entertainment Ventures, LLC.