|
With the benefit of hindsight, last year's playoff run by the Dallas Mavericks was more predictable than the Mavericks' pedestrian regular-season performance indicated. When Dallas was six games into its eventual march to a championship, I took a look at the lineups the Mavericks were using and found they were much more effective than the team's overall performance. Playing without an injured Dirk Nowitzki had artificially limited Dallas' point differential (and record), while the addition of Peja Stojakovic midseason strengthened the bench for the postseason.
As this year's playoffs approach, then, I wanted to take a look at the likely rotations for playoff teams to see who might be underestimated like the Mavericks were a year ago. Since projecting out lineups would be too difficult to do, I instead looked at the on-court results in terms of team Offensive and Defensive Ratings (mostly via BasketballValue.com, but with NBA.com/Stats filling in data for the Memphis Grizzlies and players that changed teams) weighted by projected playing time. Applying the same method to Dallas a year ago doesn't show as dramatic a difference as the lineup analysis, but does improve the Mavericks' projected net differential from +4.5 points per 100 possessions to +5.4.
Here are this year's leaders by conference, along with projected Offensive and Defensive Ratings, rankings, and their unadjusted net differential for comparison's sake.
Team ORtg DRtg Net ORk DRk Net
--------------------------------------------------------
Chicago 106.9 98.4 8.5 6 1 8.8
Miami 107.7 99.9 7.8 5 4 6.6
Philadelphia 104.9 99.2 5.7 11 3 5.5
Indiana 106.7 102.5 4.2 7 9 3.5
Atlanta 103.4 101.7 1.7 14 7 2.3
Boston 101.7 100.0 1.7 16 5 1.0
New York 104.5 102.8 1.7 12 11 2.0
Orlando 105.0 104.3 0.7 10 12 0.6
Team ORtg DRtg Net ORk DRk Net
--------------------------------------------------------
San Antonio 111.8 102.5 9.3 1 9 7.7
Oklahoma City 109.3 102.4 6.9 2 8 6.3
L.A. Clippers 108.8 104.7 4.1 3 14 2.9
Denver 108.5 105.2 3.3 4 15 3.1
Memphis 102.4 99.1 3.3 15 2 1.9
Dallas 103.9 101.6 2.3 13 6 1.3
L.A. Lakers 106.4 104.4 2.0 8 13 1.8
Utah 106.4 106.9 -0.5 8 16 -0.9
For the most part, these results mirror net differential, so the biggest surprises--Philadelphia in the East and Denver in the West are really examples of teams that have underachieved compared to their projected record. In the case of the 76ers, the difference between their expected record based on differential (.651) and their winning percentage (.538) is historic. Only the 1985-86 Sonics (.378 versus .497) have ever underperformed more by this regard, and just five teams--none since 1997-98--have had a difference or more than 100 percentage points.
Note that the Grizzlies' ratings are a little lower at both ends because of the different method used to define possessions by NBA.com/Stats. Memphis is seventh overall in Defensive Rating, so they're not quite as good as that end of the floor as these numbers make it appear, but also not as bad on offense. In terms of net rating, this is essentially a wash.
Let's take a more detailed look at each team's rotation and what's driving any differences.
Atlanta Hawks
Player MPG ORtg DRtg
---------------------------------------
Jeff Teague 32 106.1 102.3
Kirk Hinrich 25 102.9 103.7
Joe Johnson 36 105.7 102.4
Josh Smith 35 105.6 101.5
Jason Collins 5 89.2 95.2
Jannero Pargo 14 101.7 97.5
Willie Green 14 100.3 105.9
Tracy McGrady 14 100.7 98.6
Marvin Williams 27 103.9 103.5
Vladimir Radmanovic 5 102.7 96.9
Ivan Johnson 23 100.1 99.7
Zaza Pachulia 10 104.1 102.9
The Hawks come out a little worse because of injuries. Al Horford isn't expected to play until at least the conference semifinals, should Atlanta advance, and Zaza Pachulia's minutes may be limited. More Jason Collins is bad news for the Hawks.
Boston Celtics
Player MPG ORtg DRtg
---------------------------------------
Rajon Rondo 38 103.6 100.4
Avery Bradley 30 100.5 97.1
Paul Pierce 40 102.6 99.9
Brandon Bass 35 103.4 100.5
Kevin Garnett 34 104.1 98.5
Keyon Dooling 10 94.3 106.9
Ray Allen 18 102.5 101.2
Mickael Pietrus 15 100.5 100.4
Greg Stiemsma 20 95.0 101.2
The Celtics benefit more from tightening their rotation than almost anyone else in the league, given the massive gap in performance between their starters and their reserves. Predict a healthy Ray Allen for more minutes and Boston emerges as the better team than Atlanta.
Chicago Bulls
Player MPG ORtg DRtg
---------------------------------------
Derrick Rose 40 109.4 99.3
Richard Hamilton 25 108.2 101.4
Luol Deng 42 106.2 97.1
Carlos Boozer 30 107.1 102.0
Joakim Noah 30 107.9 101.2
C.J. Watson 12 103.7 103.0
Ronnie Brewer 10 106.0 97.9
Kyle Korver 15 108.0 97.1
Taj Gibson 22 105.7 90.6
Omer Asik 14 101.1 91.6
Chicago comes out weaker by this method than overall. Part of the reason is using C.J. Watson rather than John Lucas as the backup point guard. The Bulls have been far stronger with Lucas on the floor this season.
Indiana Pacers
Player MPG ORtg DRtg
---------------------------------------
George Hill 35 106.8 102.8
Paul George 32 107.0 100.3
Danny Granger 36 108.9 101.4
David West 33 107.6 101.5
Roy Hibbert 30 108.2 102.6
Darren Collison 18 107.1 103.1
Leandro Barbosa 23 105.4 105.1
Tyler Hansbrough 18 103.0 104.4
Louis Amundson 15 102.0 104.1
Miami Heat
Player MPG ORtg DRtg
---------------------------------------
Mario Chalmers 30 108.7 99.1
Dwyane Wade 38 109.5 99.6
LeBron James 39 109.4 99.9
Chris Bosh 35 109.5 100.0
Joel Anthony 18 111.5 100.3
Mike Miller 18 110.9 102.0
James Jones 8 105.3 101.9
Shane Battier 15 105.3 101.2
Udonis Haslem 24 103.0 100.2
Ronny Turiaf 15 96.1 96.4
Projecting a playoff rotation improves the Heat's projected net differential by 1.2 points, the largest change of any East team. Much of that is removing the ineffective Norris Cole from the lineup. Making these adjustments brings Miami-Chicago to close to a tossup, whereas overall statistics show the Bulls as the clear favorites.
New York Knicks
Player MPG ORtg DRtg
---------------------------------------
Baron Davis 25 106.7 103.4
Iman Shumpert 32 104.9 102.2
Carmelo Anthony 40 105.5 103.7
Amare Stoudemire 30 100.5 104.2
Tyson Chandler 35 103.2 101.8
Mike Bibby 10 97.2 107.1
J.R. Smith 28 107.5 103.3
Landry Fields 20 105.0 100.6
Steve Novak 20 106.2 100.7
I figured the Knicks would improve much more by this method than they did, given how massively different their rotation is now than at the start of the season. However, long minutes for Amar'e Stoudemire could work against them. New York would also do well to excise Mike Bibby from the rotation.
Orlando Magic
Player MPG ORtg DRtg
---------------------------------------
Jameer Nelson 35 109.2 105.3
Jason Richardson 28 107.0 103.1
Hedo Turkoglu 32 108.6 104.3
Ryan Anderson 40 110.2 103.9
Glen Davis 35 100.6 104.0
Chris Duhon 13 101.9 100.8
J.J. Redick 26 104.1 105.1
Quentin Richardson 10 95.0 102.0
Earl Clark 8 91.1 106.5
Daniel Orton 13 98.4 108.3
The back end of the Magic's post-Dwight Howard rotation has been ineffective, but the likely return of Hedo Turkoglu will help significantly.
Philadelphia 76ers
Player MPG ORtg DRtg
---------------------------------------
Jrue Holiday 35 103.5 98.9
Jodie Meeks 25 104.1 97.9
Andre Iguodala 38 103.5 97.6
Elton Brand 34 103.9 97.1
Spencer Hawes 20 104.9 101.8
Louis Williams 30 107.3 100.7
Evan Turner 20 104.6 100.9
Thaddeus Young 28 108.3 100.7
Nikola Vucevic 10 103.3 98.8
The Sixers have been more or less going with their playoff rotation for the last month, so don't expect things to change much, for better or for worse.
Dallas Mavericks
Player MPG ORtg DRtg
---------------------------------------
Jason Kidd 34 103.6 100.9
Delonte West 22 97.8 98.4
Shawn Marion 30 101.5 102.2
Dirk Nowitzki 36 106.3 100.5
Brendan Haywood 17 102.8 99.9
Rodrigue Beaubois 15 105.7 103.6
Jason Terry 34 104.5 104.8
Vince Carter 23 107.3 99.9
Brandan Wright 20 105.7 104.7
Ian Mahinmi 9 103.1 100.5
This year's Mavericks actually improve more than last year's group by projecting a rotation, largely because Lamar Odom was so ineffective. However, Dallas' overall numbers are way, way down from 2010-11, so this still leaves them sixth in the West.
Denver Nuggets
Player MPG ORtg DRtg
---------------------------------------
Ty Lawson 35 107.7 105.2
Arron Afflalo 39 107.3 106.0
Danilo Gallinari 35 108.6 100.9
Kenneth Faried 25 109.5 108.6
Kosta Koufos 15 110.3 104.5
Andre Miller 26 110.6 105.9
Corey Brewer 18 107.3 106.0
Al Harrington 25 108.9 103.9
JaVale McGee 22 106.9 107.3
The Nuggets are another team whose rotation will be almost entirely unchanged, though their results during the regular season have been better than most people have noticed. Denver might be the favorite in a series with the L.A. Lakers.
L.A. Clippers
Player MPG ORtg DRtg
---------------------------------------
Chris Paul 38 112.8 105.7
Randy Foye 24 106.4 105.0
Caron Butler 28 112.8 105.5
Blake Griffin 36 112.2 105.1
DeAndre Jordan 30 110.5 104.1
Eric Bledsoe 12 102.4 98.7
Maurice Williams 24 107.2 107.6
Nick Young 15 103.3 102.2
Reggie Evans 8 100.8 110.5
Kenyon Martin 25 103.7 101.7
The Clippers' current rotation has been solid over the last month and a half. Check out how well the team defends with Eric Bledsoe on the floor.
L.A. Lakers
Player MPG ORtg DRtg
---------------------------------------
Ramon Sessions 28 109.5 106.8
Kobe Bryant 38 106.3 103.0
Matt Barnes 30 107.3 104.6
Pau Gasol 39 106.6 103.0
Andrew Bynum 33 105.3 103.2
Steve Blake 25 104.2 103.1
Devin Ebanks 23 107.2 104.4
Josh McRoberts 15 103.8 110.4
Troy Murphy 9 105.9 104.9
From this limited perspective, Metta World Peace's suspension may actually help the Lakers. They were +1.1 points per 100 possessions with him on the floor this season, worse than their performance with either Matt Barnes or Devin Ebanks and their overall level of play. Note that I did not include hero of the hour Jordan Hill because he did not play enough minutes with the Lakers for the results to be reliable.
Memphis Grizzlies
Player MPG ORtg DRtg
---------------------------------------
Mike Conley 32 104.4 98.9
Tony Allen 28 102.6 96.0
Rudy Gay 36 102.3 100.5
Zach Randolph 30 106.1 99.5
Marc Gasol 34 102.8 97.9
Gilbert Arenas 10 103.5 97.8
O.J. Mayo 28 100.4 100.4
Quincy Pondexter 10 100.9 98.8
Dante Cunningham 10 97.5 98.6
Marreese Speights 22 98.3 101.2
The Grizzlies take the second-largest leap of any team when projecting their playoff rotation, largely because Gilbert Arenas has been so much more effective than rookies Jeremy Pargo and Josh Selby as a backup to Mike Conley. If Arenas' injuries are a problem, Memphis now has Lester Hudson as an alternative to Pargo and Selby.
Oklahoma City Thunder
Player MPG ORtg DRtg
---------------------------------------
Russell Westbrook 37 110.0 102.9
Thabo Sefolosha 20 103.5 95.1
Kevin Durant 39 109.8 103.3
Serge Ibaka 28 107.7 101.7
Kendrick Perkins 28 105.5 102.2
Derek Fisher 18 105.8 101.7
James Harden 32 115.0 105.7
Daequan Cook 10 105.9 100.7
Nick Collison 22 114.9 104.5
Nazr Mohammed 6 110.0 103.8
One small way the Thunder could help itself is by directing more minutes to Daequan Cook in small lineups rather than Derek Fisher, though the team has performed reasonably well with Fisher on the floor. Nick Collison finishing games instead of Kendrick Perkins would also apparently be an upgrade.
San Antonio Spurs
Player MPG ORtg DRtg
---------------------------------------
Tony Parker 34 110.1 101.2
Daniel Green 18 109.4 102.1
Kawhi Leonard 19 109.9 104.8
Tim Duncan 34 107.9 100.7
Tiago Splitter 20 113.0 103.1
Gary Neal 20 112.4 106.1
Manu Ginobili 28 121.0 106.2
Stephen Jackson 25 110.5 99.9
Matt Bonner 18 115.8 102.1
DeJuan Blair 12 105.6 105.3
Boris Diaw 12 112.9 96.5
Good luck predicting which of his 11 good players Gregg Popovich will use from series to series, let alone game to game. The Spurs improve more than any other team by this method, for a couple of reasons. First, nobody has had more garbage time than San Antonio. Second, the Spurs have been lights-out with newcomers Boris Diaw and Stephen Jackson in the rotation. Check out those net ratings.
Utah Jazz
Player MPG ORtg DRtg
---------------------------------------
Devin Harris 35 108.2 108.4
Gordon Hayward 37 107.4 107.5
DeMarre Carroll 14 109.0 110.4
Paul Millsap 38 108.7 106.4
Al Jefferson 37 109.3 108.3
Jamaal Tinsley 14 106.1 108.5
Alec Burks 12 103.6 104.8
C.J. Miles 17 103.1 105.5
Derrick Favors 26 101.2 103.1
Enes Kanter 10 96.4 104.3
Unfortunately, this method probably doesn't go far enough to demonstrate how the Jazz might be improved in the postseason. Utah has been outscored by 1.9 points per 100 possessions with Derrick Favors on the floor, but as David Locke has noted on Twitter, that's largely because Favors' minutes overlapped with those of rookie Enes Kanter. When Favors was on the floor with another starting big, the Jazz was far more effective. And when Favors played with both Al Jefferson and Paul Millsap, well, saying it saved the season turned out not to be hyperbole.
Kevin Pelton is an author of Basketball Prospectus.
You can contact Kevin by clicking here or click here to see Kevin's other articles.
|
The Nuggets a favorite over the Lakers? That's going to ruffle some feathers. Great stuff here, very interesting.
Efficiency differential is a blunt instrument I guess when trying to gauge playoff chances...